Pentagon Nash Equilibrium
The Scoring Formula
The core mechanic of 5xFaction is the Pentagon Nash Equilibrium scoring system.
Score = Σ(Target TVLs) - Σ(Predator TVLs)Mathematical Definition
For any faction F:
Targets(F)
Set of 2 factions that F defeats
Predators(F)
Set of 2 factions that defeat F
TVL(X)
Total Value Locked in faction X
Score(F)
Net advantage of faction F
Score(F) = TVL(Targets[0]) + TVL(Targets[1]) - TVL(Predators[0]) - TVL(Predators[1])Complete Scoring Table
SHADOW
(Spirit + Wind) - (Blade + Pillar)
TVL₃ + TVL₅ - TVL₂ - TVL₄
BLADE
(Shadow + Pillar) - (Spirit + Wind)
TVL₁ + TVL₄ - TVL₃ - TVL₅
SPIRIT
(Blade + Wind) - (Shadow + Pillar)
TVL₂ + TVL₅ - TVL₁ - TVL₄
PILLAR
(Shadow + Spirit) - (Blade + Wind)
TVL₁ + TVL₃ - TVL₂ - TVL₅
WIND
(Blade + Pillar) - (Shadow + Spirit)
TVL₂ + TVL₄ - TVL₁ - TVL₃
Visual Example
Winner: BLADE with score of +60
Nash Equilibrium Properties
Zero-Sum Nature
The sum of all faction scores always equals zero:
This ensures the system is balanced — for every advantage, there's an equal disadvantage.
Dynamic Equilibrium
As TVL shifts, optimal faction choice changes:
No Dominant Strategy
Unlike rock-paper-scissors with 3 options, the 5-faction pentagon creates:
More complex strategy space
Multiple viable counter-strategies
Richer metagame evolution
Strategic Implications
1. Contrarian Value
When a faction is popular (high TVL), its predators gain automatic score advantage.
2. Minority Advantage
Backing an unpopular faction means fewer predators are attracted to counter you.
3. TVL Momentum
Large TVL swings during the 2-day deposit phase can flip optimal strategy entirely.
4. Game Theory Application
Skilled players must model:
Other players' likely choices
Second-order effects (what others think others will choose)
Time-weighted deposit patterns
The 7-Day Cycle Strategy
Deposit Phase
2 days
Analyze, stake, adjust
Lock Phase
5 days
Hold position, yield generates
Resolution
End of Day 7
Winner determined, yield distributed
The extended 5-day lock phase means:
More yield accumulates
Commitment matters more
Strategic decisions have larger impact
Last updated
